“We are not just changing how we work—we are
redefining what it means to be a prosthodontist.”
The evolution of prosthodontics has been disrupted
by the relentless adoption of the scanners, CAD/
CAM systems, Virtual articulators, and AI-assisted
planning. For recent graduates, there is a clear
“Digital First” approach, intent on maximizing
efficiency, accuracy, and overall patient experience.
Such changes are certainly advantageous. Routine
digital
processes enhance treatment delivery,
facilitate better interactions, and improve overall
productivity. But as we embrace this transformation,
we must pause and ask:
Are we risking the loss of the core principles that
once defined our specialty?
What Are We Gaining?
Digital dentistry has reimagined prosthodontics. It
offers:
New graduates are often more comfortable with
software than with articulators or wax. Digital literacy
is no longer optional—it’s essential.
What Might We Be Losing?
Yet digital proficiency is not a substitute for clinical
wisdom. The older strategies of facebows, wax-ups,
and physical articulators provided more than just
skills—they offered an insightful understanding of
biology along with the function and form. These skills
revolve around crafting decisions that no scanner
will ever match. When relying completely on digital
outputs, clinicians run the risk of detaching critical
thinking skills from their work. Technology might
provide suggestions, but can the clinician ensure
that it’s biologically plausible, functionally rational,
and esthetically appealing? Without grounding
in fundamentals, digital dentistry risks becoming
digital dependency.
It’s Not Either/Or
This is not a debate between digital and analog—it is
a call for integration. In today’s world, prosthodontists
might be forced to become a jack of all trade:
Both teaching and academic practices face the
challenge of keeping up with such changes. Instead
of replacing core competencies, innovations should
enhance them.
What Defines the Modern Prosthodontist?
We need to inquire not only how we practice but
rather who we are as a profession. Is a prosthodontist
defined by their tool, or is he defined by a way of
thinking? Change in technology will remain constant.
What must remain is our pledge to compassionate,
ethical, and patient-centered care. Sound judgment
alongside profound comprehension of oral biology
renders a scanner, printer, and AI incapable of
replacing our care.
A Call to Our Community
The Journal of Prosthetic and Implant Dentistry invites
prosthodontists, educators, researchers, and students
to join this timely conversation.
Call for Contributions
Theme: Digital First or Fundamentals First?
Submission Type: Viewpoints, Essays, Letters to the
Editor, or Short Commentaries
Deadline: 31/07/2025
Word Limit: 500–1500 words
Submit to: ipskeralaeditor@gmail.com
Format: MS Word, Vancouver referencing style, max.
5 references