JPID - Vol 03 - Issue 02

REVIEW ON NEWER APPROACH FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF DENTURE STOMATITIS

*Femin David, *Ponjayanthi.V, **Allen Jim Hines, ***T. Sreelal, ****Aparna Mohan
*Post Graduate Students, **Senior lecturer, ***Professor & Head of the department, ****Reader, Dept of Prosthodontics, Sree Mookambika Institute of Dental Science, Kulasekharam, Kanyakumari, Tamilnadu | Corresponding Author: Dr. Femin David, E-mail: drfemindavid@gmail.com

Abstract:

ABSTRACT: Dentures can produce various changes in the oral environment which remains unforeseen in most of the cases. As denture is the main reason behind denture stomatitis, proper oral and denture hygiene should be maintained in order to avoid this condition. In the present review article various etiological factors, physiology, clinical features and treatment modalities of denture stomatitis are discussed.

Key words: Denturestomatitis, poor oral hygiene, candidialinfection, chronic atrophic candidiasis, inflammatory papillary hyperplasia.

Introduction:

Denture stomatitis indicates an inflammatory process of the mucosa that bears a complete or partial removable dental appliance, typically a denture. Incidence of occurrence is 11-67% in complete denture wearers. Denture stomatitis is also known by the names Denture sore mouth, inflammatory papillary hyperplasia, denture induced stomatitis and chronic atrophic candidiasis. Success in the treatment of complete denture patients requires not only mechanical skills and proficiency but also a knowledge of the physiology of the involved anatomical structures and an understanding of the possible pathologic changes that may occur after the treatment.

Clinical appearance

Clinically Denture stomatitis appears in various types. Some authors have classified Denture stomatitis into:

A. Newton1 Classification (1962)

  • TYPE 1: Pin point hyperaemic foci or localised simple inflammation (Fig.1)
  • TYPE 2: Diffuse hyperaemia of denture supporting tissue or generalised simple inflammation (Fig.2)
  • TYPE 3: Papillary hyperplasia or inflammatory papillary hyperplasia (Fig.3)

B. Budtz – Jorgensen & Bertram Classification (1970)

  • TYPE1: Simple localised inflammation
  • TYPE2: Simple diffuse (generalised) inflammation
  • TYPE 3: Granular inflammation

C. Bergendal (1982)

  • Atropic denture stomatitis
  • Hyperplastic denture stomatitis

Etiological factors

The causative factor for Denture stomatitis is multifactorial. Some authors believe that there is no primary etiological factor behind it. Other factors thought to be particularly significant is:

1. Candidial infection:
Cahn (1936) 1st proposed that infection by candida albicans were responsible for denture stomatitis. Factors responsible for colonisation of candida species in fitting denture surface are adherence of yeast cells, Interaction with oralcommensal bacteria, Redox potential of the site, Surface property of acrylic resin. Factors that increase the susceptibility to candida – associated denture stomatitis includes aging, malnutrition , immunosuppression, radiotherapy, diabetes mellitus, and treatment with antibacterial antibiotics.

According to Boucher’s 12th edition factors predisposing to denture stomatitis are:

Systemic-old age, diabetes mellitus, nutritional deficiencies (iron, folate, vitamin b12 deficiency), malignancies (acute leukaemia, agranulocytosis), immune defects, corticosteroids, immunosuppressive drugs.

Local-Dentures(changes in the environmental condition, trauma, denture usage, denture cleanliness), xerostomia (sjogren’s syndrome, irradiation, drug therapy), High carbohydrate diet, Broad spectrum antibiotics, Smoking tobacco.

2. Denture trauma (including continuous denture wearing): According to Nyquist:
Dental trauma plays a prominent role in the aetiology of denture stomatitis. It plays vital role in Type 1 & least important in other types of denture stomatitis2,3. Some researchers believe that the lesion occurs less frequently under ‘non-traumatic dentures4.

Also it is less frequently seen in patients with satisfactory alveolar ridges compared with those with flat ridges4,5. Continuous wearing of denture might cause denture stomatitis6.

Incorrect vertical dimension of occlusion has also been suggested as a contributing factor. The result of the studies by Emami E et al.., research suggest traumatic occlusion results in an inflammatory reaction which may create an environment favourable for microorganisms found in denture stomatitis.

3. Denture cleanliness(including reaction to denture plaque):
Poor oral hygiene is the most frequently involved local aetiological factor in denture stomatitis4,7. Denture provide opportunities for food lodgement and prevent the natural cleansing action by tongue, lips & cheek8,9. Poor oral hygiene is the major factor in candida related lesions. Denture cleaning methods may affect the condition of dentures, and pigmentation and abrasions in dentures occur with the use of toothpaste or hard tooth brush10: (Walker, British dental journal,1981). Poor oral hygiene, high carbohydrate intake, reduced salivary flow, composition of saliva, design of prosthesis, continuous denture wearing enhance pathogenicity of dental plaque. (fig.4)

4. Allergic and primary irritant reactions to denture base materials:
Toxicity is usually manifested by the release of several chemical constituents from the material, which can induce an allergic response in terms of localized or generalised stomatitis. This reaction may be related to presence of resin monomer, hydroquinone peroxide, dimethyl-ptoluidine or methacrylate in denture. Contact sensitivities are more common to occur with cold or auto polymerized resins than with heat cured denture base materials.

5. Systemic factors
including predisposing factors.

Physiology

Changes in the oral physiology of importance
Wearing of dentures imposes a marked change in the environmental conditions of the denture supporting tissues. Inconvenience caused by the initial insertion of denture, by excessive salivation is a transitory condition and compensation occurs within two weeks. Asialorrhea makes the denture retention difficult and predisposes to oral mucosal irritation. Due to the microbial degradation of carbohydrates contained in saliva film and in the material adherent to denture base material, there is lowering of pH of saliva in between denture base and supporting tissues, which is a predisposing factor for Monilial infections. If the denture bearing tissues are nutritionally deficient, the prosthesis will fail even if how well it is constructed.

Denture bearing area
Thin and friable epithelium covering the edentulous saddle area may not be able to tolerate the forces imposed upon it by hard unyielding acrylic. Also the connective tissue pad in between the bone and the epithelium covering may not be thick enough to absorb the forces placed upon the area.

Oral environment
Oral environment must be moist and warm and the oral mucosa must be firm elastic and able to resist mild abrasions, to keep the prosthesis comfortable. If the mouth is dry and the tissue burning and friable, it is almost impossible for the patient to tolerate even if the denture is perfectly balanced and carefully constructed.

Dehydration
As elderly people are susceptible to negative water balance, especially due to excessive water loss through insufficient or damaged kidneys, the oral mucosa also becomes dry-easily dehydrated.

Saliva
Xerostomia results when water is reduced, resulting in reduced water content in saliva, which in turn affects the mastication.

Dry mouth
Mucous membrane becomes hot, dry and fragile in dry mouth, which cannot be tolerated by denture wearers. Even most skilfully fabricated denture fails in dry mouth cases.

Osteoporosis
Osteoporosis results from the loss of bone especially the spongy spicules of bone that support the weight bearing parts of the skeleton. Osteoporosis is common in ageing person, especially in postmenopausal women when the osteogenic blood level has dropped precipitously.

Thinning of mucosa
The epithelium becomes very thin in elderly; hence a prosthesis placed upon the edentulous ridge is now covered by a thin pad of connective tissue rests mostly on bone. It is uncomfortable the hard acrylic or metal base rest almost directly upon the bony ridge with little cushion effect between. Therefore the search for soft acrylic base to cushion the occlusal force continues.

Clinical features

Female predilection is seen in case of denture stomatitis. The Mean age is approximately 49 years (mean age at which a person start to wear denture).Common Site is under complete or partial denture, mainly in palatal areas. Appears as patchy distribution often associated with speckled curd like white lesion.

28-70% of patients with denture stomatitis have oral complaints11,12: (Nater; J Pros Dent, 1978). The symptoms include mucosal bleeding, swelling, burning or painful sensation, halitosis or an unpleasant taste & dryness in the mouth. Signs that are clinically present include bright red, oedematous and granular palatal tissue, Red patches which appears erythematous or speckled, sharply outlined border of reddened mucosa which are restricted to the tissue in contact with the denture and multiple pinpoint foci of hyperaemia are seen.

Diagnosis

Clinically an erythematous area under the complete denture aid in diagnosis of denture stomatitis. Confirmed by- mycelia or pseudo hyphae in a direct smear or high number of candida species from lesion (>50 colonies)

Yeast recovered from the fitting surface of the denture confirms, candida is the main cause of denture stomatitis.



Treatment

  • Patient counselling
  • Cessation of smoking in smokers.
  • Clean dentures regularly after each meal with a soft brush and soap.
  • Efficient plaque control
  • Overnight immersion of denture in alkaline peroxide cleanser or alkaline hypochlorite
  • Correction of ill-fitting denture
    1. Relining (fig.5)
    2. Replacement of denture if necessary
  • Disinfection-
    • 10% acetic acid (vinegar)
    • Antiseptic denture cleanser
      • Chlorhexidine
      • Dilute sodium hypochlorite
    (10 drops of household bleach in 500 ml of tap water)
  • Microwave irradiation: Immerse denture in 200ml of water & irradiate for 3min at 650W (fig.6)
  • Antifungal agents
    • TOPICAL
      • Amphotericin B-(3% lotion, twice daily)
      • Nystatin suspension (100,000 unit per ml) (fig.7)
      • Imidazole compounds
      • Clotrimazole-1% cream (fig.8)
      • Miconazole-2-4% cream
      • Ketoconazole
      • Econazole
    • SYSTEMIC
      • Cap.Fluconazole (50mg daily for 14 days)
      • Cap.Itraconazole (100 mg daily for 15days)
  • Treatment of underlying systemic diseases.
  • Lacquer or tissue conditioners containing anti- fungal are effective in some cases(lacquers containing miconazole is widely used) (fig.9)
  • Surgical treatment(in severe papillary hyperplasia):
    • Cryosurgery
    • Excision
  • Sustained drug delivery system

In this context, incorporation of antifungal agents into the denture base materials to be progressively released into the oral cavity has been suggested to prevent the biofilm accumulation, inhibit C.albicans colonization and contribute to the treatment of Denture stomatitis. This protocol requires only the use of denture by the patients, thus reducing the need for patient compliance to antifungal drug regimes.

Furthermore, the incorporation of drugs into denture liners breaks the contact between the denture biofilm & infected tissues, thus avoiding a cycle of re-infection via prosthesis, hence soft lining materials are highly recommended. In order to avoid degradation & microbial colonization antimicrobial agents are added to lining materials, mainly short term ones as tissue conditioners & temporary resilient liners which are more susceptible.

Although anti-fungal/anti-microbial effectively inhibit the growth of Candida albicans, it may affect their morphological structure, hardness, roughness, properties such as tensile strength, water absorpotion, modulus of elasticity and weight, and peel bond strength to denture base resin. Hence, Bueno, et al. determined minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of C.albicans biofilm for antifungal/antimicrobial agents added to the lining materials. Five drugs-nystatin, miconazole, ketoconazole, itraconazole and chlorhexidine diacetate are the drugs usually incorporated.

During their life cycle, polymeric materials release soluble substances like methyl methacrylate & dibutyl phthalate, which may be potentially toxic. So; it is possible to conclude that modification of temporary resilient materials by antifungal/ antimicrobial agents, especially in lower concentrations, may represent a viable protocol for treatment of denture stomatitis during a period similar to conventional therapy with topical antifungals (14 days). (fig.10)

CONCLUSION

Denture placement in the oral cavity will produce notable variations in the oral microbial flora affecting the integrity of oral tissues. Hence adequate home care instructions should be given at the time of denture delivery. Regular recall appointments to reinforce denture hygiene.

In most cases elimination of traumatic factors, adequate oral hygiene measures, administration of local antimycotic medicaments enables the healing of denture stomatitis.

REFERENCES

  1. Newton A V, Denture sore mouth- a possible aetiology. Brit Dent J, 1962; 112: 357-60
  2. Budtz-Jorgensen, E. The significance of candida albicans in denture sore mouth. Scand J dent Res. 1974; 82:151
  3. Niesluchowska, M.Spiechowicz, E., some parameters of saliva in cases of denture stomatitis infected with candida albicans. Proceedings of European Prosthodontic Association, Poland. 1980; 117.
  4. Budtz- Jorgensen, E. Bertram, U. Denture stomatitis. 1. The etiology in relation to trauma and infection. Act Odontol Scand, 1970; 28:71.
  5. Samaranayake L.P Mccourtie.Factors affecting the adherence of candida albicans to acrylic surfaces invitro. Archive oral biol, 1980; 25:611.
  6. Nyquest, G.Denture sore mouth.Act odondol scand, 1952; 9:10
  7. Bauman, Inflammatory capillary hyperplasia and home care instruction to denture patients.J Pros Dent, 1977; 37:608.
  8. Fleishman R, Peles D.V. Oral mucous lesions among elderly in Israel Dent Res, 1985.
  9. Iacoponi A, Walthem W, Geriatricprosthodontics: anoverview. Part I: Pretreatment considerations.Quint Int.1993; 24:259.
  10. Theilade, Development of bacterial plaque in oral cavity.J clin periodontal.1977; 4(5):1.
  11. Karin Hermana Neppelembroeke, Sustained drug delivery system: a promising therapy for denture stomatitis?, J Appl Oral Sci, 2016;24(5):420-2.
  12. T.Sreelal,K.ChandrasekharanNair,N.George Poulose. Physiology and treatment of Denture Stomatitis.JOSMS Vol.III.1.1992
  13. Zarb – Bolender, Prosthodontics’ treatment of edentulous patients – 12th edition, Mosby, 2003.
  14. Grenburg , Burket’s oral medicine, 11th edition,Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers, 2015
  15. Anil Govindrao Ghom, Textbook of oral medicine – 2nd edition, Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers, 2010

JPID – The journal of Prosthetic and Implant Dentistry / Volume 3 Issue 2 / Jan–Apr 2020

Copyright © 2017-2023 Indian Prosthodontic Society Kerala State Branch | IPSKERALA.COM | Powered by Dentaura.Com